Friday, May 19, 2006

Oooops, my bad

I admit it, I didn’t realize I had the wrong Harry Potter movie until I sat down to read the reflection. That being said, I observed a few things I’d like to put down, if not for everyone else, at least to clear my thoughts.

Although I haven’t read the books, Harry looks right at home on film. There is a nice blend of the current and the fanciful/historic, making it feel real without being too close to home. Recent advancements in special effects allow for fantasy style movies to be fare more realistic than, say, Willow.

In regards to the sorcery or magic, I think we need to examine closely the criticism. While there is certainly a pervading theme of magic & sorcery throughout the film, it is far less a weapon or tool than it is a convenience. In addition, it is used both positively and negatively, so that the battle between good and evil is a fair fight. Notable is Voldemort’s comment that there is no good or evil, only power and those too weak to use it. While Harry does not hesitate to use power to the extent we would like, he does use it for good, rescuing friends and saving the free world.

Finally, why these movies, and the books before them ever caught on, seems to be a deeper question than whether or not this is particularly well written. Poorly written fantasy and SF books have made money for years. Harry Potter, however, taps into a much deeper cultural vein.

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Igby goes down . . . in a slow spiral

The title character of Igby goes down is a messed up, sarcastic little brat who regularly gets beat up, both emotionally and physically by everyone he cares about, or should care about. That includes his neo-fascist (Republican) brother Ollie, his depressed and prescription addicted mother Mimi, his "“nymphomaniacal, pseudo-Bohemian JAP" quasi-girlfriend Sookie, his sadistic and egotistical godfather DH, DH'’s confused & addicted mistress Rachel and Igby'’s schizophrenic father Jason. Igby responds to the restrictions of the various private schools his mother has sent him to by running to New York, where he wanders aimlessly, looking for and finding nothing in particular. The film begins and ends with the murder / suicide of Mimi by her sons, and although some have seen the film as an explanation or build up to this, I would argue that it simply is a tool to help audiences understand that this film is postmodern and only going in circles. If you have read any reviews at all of this film, I apologize for the following repetition: This film will remind you of Catcher in the Rye. Never having read Catcher in the Rye, I don’t know this personally, but seeing it in every review of the film I read has forced me to embrace it as truth on a plane with gravity. This isn'’t "“The best coming of age film since The Graduate" as Paul Clinton says, but it is solid in dark postmodern sort of way. Igby himself is not, as Thom posits "“pretty unaffected by his traumatic life."” He is just as messed up as everyone else is, he is simply more aware of it.

**Spoilers Herein**

By the time Mimi tells Igby that DH is his father on her deathbed, the viewer probably already knows it. DH'’s constant reference to Igby as "“My Boy" combined for his constant support for the youth financially for no good reason gives us pointed clues, and Mimi'’s comment that "“His conception was an act of animosity"” sort of gives it away. But that doesn'’t seem to change his perception of either DH or the "“father"” he watched break down. He still visits Jason in the hospital before leaving for California at the end of the film, and makes no effort to reconcile with DH. It seems more to serve as hope, because he no longer feels predestined for breakdown. It i’s a last straw before he walks away from everything. The only things that are remain for him in New York is Sookie and Ollie, and he know has another barrier between himself and Ollie.

**End of Spoilers**

Pungente and Williams tie Igby to the agony of Christ in the garden. Igby, like Christ, is torn between his physical liberty and his spiritual freedom. While Igby doesn'’t know what freedom is, he knows that he doesn'’t have it, and so seeks physical liberty. Christ sacrificed his physical liberty for the spiritual freedom of submission to the father. Christ (obviously) make a much better choice, but we cannot be too hard on Igby. While we hate his attitude and callus actions towards those around him, he is primarily a product of his sinful nature and his environment.

I see a lot of Igbys in culture today, and I see a little of myself in him. He has a lot material advantages, a lot of knowledge and some friends, but no connectedness or community. Our culture has that type of individual in abundance. He covers pain with sarcasm. His pain through the actions and hypocrisy of those around him is the source for the venom he flings back. I struggle with this myself. When I get stung, the first impulse is to sting back.

Director Burr Steers tries to convince us that there is progress, but a Christian worldview struggles against that view. The music and cinematography in the film both clash with the emotionally painful dialogue. Following one of Igby'’s most emotionally painful moments in the film, discovering that Sookie is sleeping with his brother, we are treated to bright scenes of fall in Manhattan, and the somber turning joyous sound of Coldplay'’s We Live in a Beautiful World. The kids had his heart, still beating, torn out of his chest, and we'’re saying that it'’s a beautiful world? Later in the movie, when he asks to sleep with Sookie, she tells him, "No, it will just make you feel empty and lonely afterwards." Again, not much development for Igby. Even in his frustration following the death of his mother, Igby is missing the point. He denies that he will apologize to her before she dies, and shortly after she has passed, he punches her empty shell while screaming how sorry he was. In a later discussion with Ollie, he says that after he was finished pummeling her, he felt the closest to her. Of course, you dolt. It'’s easy to be close with someone who'’s dead, they will never hurt you again.

Frazier claims that Igby matures as the movie progresses, and that "he can see the edifying providence of suffering."” I don'’t see anywhere that he demonstrates that. Although he admits the military school was good for him because it gave him perspective, his better understanding of the past did not translate into better decision-making in the future. Igby ran to New York to get away from his family, and when he realized that he was not escaping, he killed his mother before running again. His sparse relationship with his brother and lack of a real father meant onlt that he will no longer be hunted down and pulled back into the negative spiral that his life was. However, because of the killing of his mother, it is difficult to see him as moving forward. Instead I would argue that Igby Goes Down seems to be a bit more like a parable for the text in Ecclesiastes. Nothing is new, and nothing is an improvement. Berardinelli says that the film "“ends pretty much where it begins"” and the same can be said for the title character.

Labels:

Sunday, May 14, 2006

Seven Questions

Responses to what Dr. Tucker asked . . .

1. What were the “house rules” related to viewing films or even TV in the home in which you grew up? How did those rules arise from faith and how did they affect your perspectives on film and faith?

Our house rules for TV were pretty simple when I was young. The news, football, Mr. Rogers Neighborhood, Leave it to Beaver and The Andy Griffith Show were ok. Any other programs were not acceptable, along with any shots of cheerleaders, and most beer commercials. Movies were generally G or PG, and always viewed as a family, whether in the theater or at home. These rules were based on the strictest possible interpretation of Philippians 4:8. There was a long period of time when we didn’t have a television. After it came back, and as I got older, more flexibility was allowed. PG-13 became OK at some point, and the TV list grew to include TV Land, basketball, & playoff hockey. Eventually, it grew into “How does this impact your relationship with God?” I think it was a good evolution, because it instilled in me first, that there are standards, and then when I was a bit more discerning, that the standards are increasingly complex.

2. What were the church rules (Youth Group?) or perspectives with reference to believers and film in the church, where you experienced the greatest spiritual formation?

There were no church rules for film or TV, but it was clear to me that most of the families at church watched more TV than we did, and clearly had more relaxed standards than we did.

3. What are the "church rules" or perspectives of the community of faith in which you are currently involved? Is film referenced or used in any manner in the corporate worship or other gatherings related to your church?

Although there is no reference to film in the corporate worship, there aren’t any specific reasons why. There are some families that don’t have TV, there are some that are well-versed in the language of cinema. The “tagline” of the church is In essentials: Unity - In nonessentials: Liberty - In all things: Love which makes it difficult to blast any particular standard if there is a biblical base to it.

4. What are your basic theological perspectives on faith and film, which you employ in your life and ministry?

Finally, an easy one! The intersection of faith and film is that very few people with understanding of one see the other very clearly. We must tread carefully as a result, because so many have gone before us in examining the intersection intentionally and stumbled badly. At the same time, both have so permeated our culture that there are countless places where they meet and have fresh meanings for one another. So while we grimace at both Left Behind and Sin City, we understand that meanings are made here, so here we must be ready to teach.

5. What has been you previous experience in courses specifically related to film/cinema; to theology and the arts; or to like courses?

My aforementioned course with Spatiality / Virtuality challenged a lot of my thinking, because of the discussions on metanarrative and reality, which required a lot more reflection by me than by others, because I was arguing about truths much closer to what I believed. I also took a Religion in Film class during one of my later semesters at UDM, which left me bitter on a lot of levels. Partially because no one would admit that their practice was out of line with their beliefs, and partially because I wasn’t allowed to use the Bible to criticize Catholic theology.

6. What three films have had the most significant effect on your Christian worldview?

Chariots of Fire

Henry V

The Matrix

7. What six films have you chosen to watch for this class for theological analysis?

Big Fish

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

Igby Goes Down

Iron Giant

The Mission

The Truman Show